A governance reference for directors, Company Secretaries, and governance professionals. Current frameworks, useful resources, and what Celagenix® is working on - curated, not cluttered.
Articles drawn directly from Celagenix Academy's own training content - the same modules and learning units behind BoardEvaluator™, adapted for the web.
In December 2017, Steinhoff International lost more than ninety percent of its market value in days. Part of the answer to how a board of experienced directors missed what was in front of them sits in a discipline too many boards treat as a box-ticking ritual: the board evaluation.
A trustee elected in March, respected and genuinely committed, still had no Trustee Training Toolkit certification on file by September. The six-month window had closed two weeks earlier, and she was now sitting on live investment resolutions without meeting the minimum skills threshold the regulator sets.
An analyst at a claims desk had the authority to overrule an AI system on every one of four thousand claims. In eight months, she used it zero times. There was a human in the loop. There was no human oversight - and a board that cannot tell the two apart is exposed.
Every Insights article, grouped by the same theme codes Celagenix® Academy uses for its own Learning Units - so what you read here lines up with what you'd study there.
In December 2017, Steinhoff International lost more than ninety percent of its market value in days. Part of the answer to how a board of experienced directors missed what was in front of them sits in a discipline too many boards treat as a box-ticking ritual: the board evaluation.
A trustee elected in March, respected and genuinely committed, still had no Trustee Training Toolkit certification on file by September. The six-month window had closed two weeks earlier, and she was now sitting on live investment resolutions without meeting the minimum skills threshold the regulator sets.
An analyst at a claims desk had the authority to overrule an AI system on every one of four thousand claims. In eight months, she used it zero times. There was a human in the loop. There was no human oversight - and a board that cannot tell the two apart is exposed.
Most boards score their own King V readiness as Materially Exposed or Substantially Ready on first pass. That is normal - King V raises the bar deliberately. What is not random is the pattern behind the shortfall.
A former contractor requested every record a company held about him under PAIA. The Information Officer opened the company's PAIA manual to check the procedure - and found a four-year-old document naming the wrong regulator, a defunct postal address, and a fee structure that no longer existed.
Forty thousand text messages queued, an email blast scheduled, a call centre working from a spreadsheet labelled "opt-out list cleaned." Every contact had been given the chance to unsubscribe and had not. By every measure that matters under South African law, that is not consent at all - and that gap is where the fines live.
A trustee leaves a board meeting and, believing she is being accountable to the union that elected her, tells them what the board debated - a benefit reduction, an actuarial shortfall, sponsor pressure. She has just breached her fiduciary duty and disclosed confidential fund information.
A director signs off the vendor’s AI policy and reasonably feels the job is done. Six months later the same tool has quietly declined a tranche of loan applications on grounds no one inside the organisation can explain. What King V Principle 10 actually asks of a board sits in the gap between those two moments.
Governance frameworks and legislation change. This reference table is maintained to reflect current versions, custodians, and source links - so you do not have to go looking.
How to use this reference: expand any theme to see the current frameworks, their version or status, a brief description of scope, and a direct link to the source document or custodian. Links open in a new tab. Last reviewed: May 2026.
A plain-language update on what is live, in development, and coming next across the Celagenix ecosystem.
This section is updated when something significant changes - not on a schedule. It reflects the actual state of the group's product and service development, not a marketing calendar.
All five SA Edition governance tools are live on the Academy - AI Governance Oversight Checklist, Director Induction Checklist, Reserved-Matters Matrix, Model Board Calendar, and Personal 90-Day Action Plan. King V 2025-aligned. Companies Act-grounded.
BoardEvaluator™ is now publicly accessible. 19 live evaluation modules including Board-as-a-Whole, Individual Director, AI Governance Status Assessment, and a Data Privacy / POPIA Gap Assessment covering POPIA, GDPR, and other applicable regimes. Facilitated or self-service packages available.
The full Board Governance curriculum is in production - six courses, 90 micro-modules, King V 2025-aligned, covering director duties, board structure, company secretary practice, and sector-specific pathways for JSE-listed entities, SOEs, retirement fund trustees, and non-profits.
A structured POPIA training programme for Information Officers, Deputy Information Officers, and staff awareness - building on the existing free POPIA compliance assessment and the group's data privacy consulting practice.
StratDash® strategy consulting for growing businesses - three tiers from a single 90-minute session to a monthly retainer as an embedded strategist. Launching via Celagenix® Agency in 2026.
When we have something worth saying, we say it on LinkedIn. Not noise - governance insights, framework updates, and ecosystem developments from the Celagenix team.
We post when we have something substantive to contribute. Which means when we do post, it is worth reading.
linkedin.com/company/celagenixgroup